The pro version is working pretty good without any bugs and etc...
As you can see in top of thread this hack is NOT supported so what is the point of ??
Nothing maybe something else but i cannot type that here.

Even this hack is not supported Geek is trying to support everyone as he could. He has a life and etc.. Try to show some respect to people.

:up:

sorry, but I simply missed your question.

The answer is yes, it will replace multiple words, however there are certain limitations. If it doesnt appear to be working, double check the source code fro the words in question to see if there is formatting arounf any of the words which would make GAL pass it by. THe other thing to check is to ensure that it is active.

HTHs

installed, thanks

How will this hack affect server performance?
If each posting needs to be parsed and checked for GALs any time it is to be viewed, this must have an effect.
Or does it user the vB built in posting cache? If yes, how will newly added GALs be worked into posts which are already in the cache?

It nearly has no effects. I used Gal on shared hosting with average of 150 autolinks and i can easily say that it didn't effect my board at all.

How long is a bit o string? ;)

I have seen sites with 1,000 GALs that the admin claims has little to no impact - however I would suspect that its not a heavily trafficked site.

The more traffic, the more gals, the more load. On light to medium traffic it most likely wont make a noticeable difference unless you add shed loads of entries.

I have the same problem, no links. But I was looking at the screenshot IrPr provided (the far right one with the code). Shouldn't there be a: > around the last part of the: 'gal' title=' (after the link)?

The code is fine. Can you provide a URl and ensure that the items are active?

Thanks for the quick response. Yes, it is active (set to yes) and I pm'd you with a url.

Thank you