PDA

View Full Version : clantmg.com forums

imported_TMG1
12-01-2002, 01:48 AM
check them out tell me what ya think bet you'll diss them but o well gimme your suggestions

http://clantmg.com/vB
filburt1
12-01-2002, 02:12 AM
Why not upgrade to 2.2.9? There are lots of security holes before 2.2.9 and TONS in 2.2.1.
imported_TMG1
12-01-2002, 02:16 AM
cause too much work i'll just leave it as is.
filburt1
12-01-2002, 02:18 AM
Your choice and risk, I suppose...
imported_TMG1
12-01-2002, 02:19 AM
hey what about the board
filburt1
12-01-2002, 02:24 AM
It has a lot of my mods so it rocks :p

Seriously though, I've never been a fan of white-on-black designs. They just look unprofessional and on some monitors hard to read. Also you're missing some <normalfont>s and <smallfont>s

And this will turn off 90% of your visitors from becoming regular posters:
Guests

You can't see any posts only registered members can see posts so go HERE to register.
imported_TMG1
12-01-2002, 02:31 AM
well thats for a reason. people like to steal things off the boards and if they can read it why register?? but hey if ya wanna give me a style im all for it lol
Cypher720
12-01-2002, 03:37 AM
Well...im glad to see that you are using my postbit...but it honestly doesnt go with the style at ALL!!!

lol
Tony G
12-01-2002, 04:10 AM
2.2.1? Your crazy. You should really upgrade.
Cypher720
12-01-2002, 12:41 PM
i dont mean to be a pain in the arse, but my guess is that you might be using a pirated version...cause NOBODY stays with 2.2.1 when 2.2.8 and 2.2.9 are out.

im not accusing, just inquiring;)
N9ne
12-01-2002, 01:08 PM
Cypher: that's not true...I just finished hacking a 2.2.8 and I'm not going to upgrade for another year...by then 3.1.5 or something will be out, and I will still be using 2.2.8 :p
Cypher720
12-01-2002, 01:21 PM
well...i see where you are coming from.

as i said...no accusations. I probably wont upgrade to 3 yet due to hacks and stuff...but we will see.

2.2.9 and 2.2.1 is a big security difference.

2.2.8 and 3.1.5 (or w/e) is a COMPLETELY differnet script. vb3 is much different than 2, so thats not really a problem...if you see what i mean
Tony G
12-02-2002, 03:05 AM
Originally posted by N9ne
Cypher: that's not true...I just finished hacking a 2.2.8 and I'm not going to upgrade for another year...by then 3.1.5 or something will be out, and I will still be using 2.2.8 :p

This is 2.2.1, you have 2.2.8 with ALOT less security problems.
Kikyourt
12-03-2002, 06:08 PM
vBulletin 3 is and looks crap. But back to the topic, I quite like it TMG1. Good work!
Tony G
12-03-2002, 08:12 PM
Erm, there was no discussion on vb3 Kikyourt. o_O
filburt1
12-03-2002, 08:47 PM
Also THE VB3 STYLE SET ISN'T WHAT YOU'RE SEEING. The final style set is in development.
Tony G
12-03-2002, 08:53 PM
And also, you can customize it just as much as the vb2 styles. So those days should be good. :)
MaXNet
12-07-2002, 07:13 PM
Originally posted by Kikyourt
vBulletin 3 is and looks crap. But back to the topic, I quite like it TMG1. Good work!

Yup and definately agreed. :)

I dont know about what you guys think of vB3, but i personally think its starting to become a total bloatware, a different script will mean faster db processing? i dont think so.. it really depends on the server and its configs.

But then again, i could be totally bumed out :) .heh.

but d00d.. i just saw your vbb, personally i dont like blue with a black BG.. and especially highliter type blue.. it just throws people of the board man.
filburt1
12-07-2002, 07:20 PM
Okay:


You people are not smart to say that vB3 is bloatware. You're basing your unfounded assumptions on the uncompleted, temporary style set. Virtually every page is much faster and uses far fewer queries.

Don't judge vB3 until it is released in at least beta form and you can actually access the admin CP and play around with it.