View Full Version : vB.org hit by spammers!
miner
11-30-2012, 07:30 AM
Today i notice too many spam posts @vB.org.:mad:
Amaury
11-30-2012, 07:33 AM
Lynne said she thinks there was an update to xRumer recently, and that's why there's been more spam lately.
miner
11-30-2012, 07:43 AM
Lynne said she thinks there was an update to xRumer recently, and that's why there's been more spam lately.
Thanks for the info.:)
Mr_Running
11-30-2012, 11:13 AM
Yes, I notice this lately and have been reporting each post but I will just stop. I'm sure the staff will figure it out. :)
Brandon Sheley
11-30-2012, 01:55 PM
There was an update to xrumer a few weeks ago, forums all over are getting hit with spam, not just vBulletin.
With that said, I haven't seen much on vb.org but I wouldn't doubt there is some.
Maybe the site has enough staff to kill the post before most see them.
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 01:58 PM
There was an update to xrumer a few weeks ago, forums all over are getting hit with spam, not just vBulletin.
With that said, I haven't seen much on vb.org but I wouldn't doubt there is some.
Maybe the site has enough staff to kill the post before most see them.Not mine - the mod in my signature stops them cold.
Simon Lloyd
11-30-2012, 02:28 PM
Not mine - the mod in my signature stops them cold.Lol, i dont use that mod and i've only banned 40 usernames in 3 years :)
Sean James
11-30-2012, 02:39 PM
Few of my sites have been getting hit hard, even with spam plugins installed.
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 02:41 PM
Lol, i dont use that mod and i've only banned 40 usernames in 3 years :)I never had any actually make it far enough to get a ban, even before that Mod. But hey, you and I seem to be a little more zealous about stopping spam than vB dot org appears to be.
But hey, you and I seem to be a little more zealous about stopping spam than vB dot org appears to be.
You might be right about that. But I think one should distinguish between spam and a spam "problem". On this site it's limited to a few forums that non-licensed members are allowed to post in, so I don't think it interferes with operation of the site, and it gets removed in a matter of hours. Also, there *are* measures being taken to limit it, but it takes time and it's not announced to the public (or even to me since it's an admin issue).
Paul M
11-30-2012, 03:22 PM
Not mine - the mod in my signature stops them cold.
No, it doesnt. It may limit them, but thats all.
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 03:29 PM
No, it doesnt. It may limit them, but thats all.It stops them completely and redirects them off the site, and places the IP used in MU. I'm down to catching only 20 or so a day now with it.
--------------- Added 1354293038 at 1354293038 ---------------
You might be right about that. But I think one should distinguish between spam and a spam "problem". On this site it's limited to a few forums that non-licensed members are allowed to post in, so I don't think it interferes with operation of the site, and it gets removed in a matter of hours. Also, there *are* measures being taken to limit it, but it takes time and it's not announced to the public (or even to me since it's an admin issue).ALL spam is a spam problem. I don't distinguish. It's about standards.
Edit: There's not much point in us going back and forth about this - if you think this site doesn't do enough to stop spam, that's your opinion. Mine is that it's only a problem for the people who are looking to make it one.
BirdOPrey5
11-30-2012, 04:31 PM
It stops them completely and redirects them off the site, and places the IP used in MU. I'm down to catching only 20 or so a day now with it.
Not wise. Those settings must be loaded and parsed on every page load of your forum. With a handful of entries it's no big deal, but leave that on long enough and hundreds of IPs will turn into thousands, and then tens of thousands... Eventually you will exhaust your PHP memory limit or MySQL packet limit- but well before then you'll see noticeable slowdown of your site.
The vBulletin Ban IP box, or any mod settings is not designed to hold thousands of entries.
The best solution would be to regularly output a text file of IP addresses and have some way to block them on the server level- before vBulletin or even htaccess is accessed.
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 04:41 PM
Not wise. Those settings must be loaded and parsed on every page load of your forum. With a handful of entries it's no big deal, but leave that on long enough and hundreds of IPs will turn into thousands, and then tens of thousands... Eventually you will exhaust your PHP memory limit or MySQL packet limit- but well before then you'll see noticeable slowdown of your site.
The vBulletin Ban IP box, or any mod settings is not designed to hold thousands of entries.
The best solution would be to regularly output a text file of IP addresses and have some way to block them on the server level- before vBulletin or even htaccess is accessed.I purge it once a week and submit to Project Honey Pot.
--------------- Added 1354297399 at 1354297399 ---------------
Edit: There's not much point in us going back and forth about this - if you think this site doesn't do enough to stop spam, that's your opinion. Mine is that it's only a problem for the people who are looking to make it one.Who's looking to make a problem, a problem? It IS a problem. It's been the bane of message boards since day one and the defeatist attitude of "no matter what you do there will still be spam" is a big part of the reason why. I'm just too militant about it I suppose.
It IS a problem. It's been the bane of message boards since day one and the defeatist attitude of "no matter what you do there will still be spam" is a big part of the reason why. I'm just too militant about it I suppose.
Spam in general is a problem. But to "solve' the problem it isn't necessary to eliminate 100% of all spam, it's only necessary to reduce it to the point where it doesn't interfere with purpose of the site. If you want to insist that it must be 100% eliminated, that's your business, but I disagree.
Again, to accept that there will always be spam isn't defeatist, it's just practical. There's a trade-off between allowng spammers and making it easy for "legitimate" users to use the site. I think there are a lot of people who would rather deal with some spam by removing it when it happens rather than deter even one legitimate user from registering.
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 05:08 PM
Spam in general is a problem. But to "solve' the problem it isn't necessary to eliminate 100% of all spam, it's only necessary to reduce it to the point where it doesn't interfere with purpose of the site. If you want to insist that it must be 100% eliminated, that's your business, but I disagree.
Again, to accept that there will always be spam isn't defeatist, it's just practical. There's a trade-off between allowng spammers and making it easy for "legitimate" users to use the site. I think there are a lot of people who would rather deal with some spam by removing it when it happens rather than deter even one legitimate user from registering.Definitely a no-no and it's never happened on my site.
Annoying legitimate users is part of the trade-off for many anyway, no? Lots of boards use post count and/or time since registered restrictions, to inhibit spammers. They use CAPTCHA and/or random questions, etc. These annoy legitimate users. Therefore for my own personal goal, the bar is set higher. Make 100% of ALL spam impossible on my site. That's the standard.... The goal being shot at. Is it Don Quixote and the windmill? Well, currently there are three botnet administrators in federal prison who I personally helped put there. I wonder what they would say about it?
Everyone sets their personal standards for their own sites regarding spam and I have no problem with that. I personally believe vB dot org's standards need to be higher. I just saw three new spam threads, right before I read your reply here. I wonder how many of those could be stopped with the registration time check? I wonder what the resistance is for trying it, since it cannot interfere with legitimate humans and doesn't conflict with native vB human verification or any anti-spam mod out there?
I'm just saying, vB dot org should try harder than it appears they are.
I just saw three new spam threads, right before I read your reply here.
Sorry, but that's not true. I can see a list of new posts and of spammers who were banned today, and there hasn't been three in the past few hours, much less three new threads.
I'm just saying, vB dot org should try harder than it appears they are.
Again, based on your idea that it has to be 100% eliminated, not on any real problem being caused by it.
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 05:16 PM
Sorry, but that's not true. I can see a list of new posts and of spammers who were banned today, and there hasn't been three in the past few hours, much less three new threads.Hey Man, I SAW them. They were in this very forum and they are indeed gone now. You're calling me a liar?
--------------- Added 1354299450 at 1354299450 ---------------
Again, based on your idea that it has to be 100% eliminated, not on any real problem being caused by it.Where did I say it HAS to be? I didn't, I said it was the GOAL.
Hey Man, I SAW them. They were in this very forum and they are indeed gone now. You're calling me a liar?
No, sorry, I was wrong - there were three by the same spammer, which is why I only saw the one spammer banned recently.
The point is (again) that the amount of spam this site is getting is not a problem to the operation of the site. Maybe it doesn't meet your standards, but that doesn't make it a problem. It's obvious that you keep bringing this up because of the mod you're pushing. You didn't come up with the idea for that mod nor did you code it, so what *is* your reason for pushing it on this site? Do you just want bragging rights for having "solved" the spam "problem" here?
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 05:30 PM
No, sorry, I was wrong - there were three by the same spammer, which is why I only saw the one spammer banned recently.
The point is (again) that the amount of spam this site is getting is not a problem to the operation of the site. Maybe it doesn't meet your standards, but that doesn't make it a problem. It's obvious that you keep bringing this up because of the mod you're pushing. You didn't come up with the idea for that mod nor did you code it, so what *is* your reason for pushing it on this site? Do you just want bragging rights for having "solved" the spam "problem" here?Wrong again. One, I didn't bring it up, didn't start this thread and two, we see threads just like this quite often, complaining about spam. So clearly it IS a problem to many of the membership here, not just me.
See?
I'm not "pushing" anything, just sharing a very good solution that should become widely enough used to see if it prompts a response from the botnet administrators and the coders of the bot programs. Will it? Let's find out!
ForceHSS
11-30-2012, 05:42 PM
Why not make it so all new members who post are put under moderation and only mods/admins see the posts this way none of us see their posts but if a new member is an owner of a vb license then he is put into the correct group
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 05:49 PM
Dude, you edited my post instead of quoting it and replying...
https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showpost.php?p=2386934&postcount=24
Please fix.
Dude, you edited my post instead of quoting it and replying...
https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showpost.php?p=2386934&postcount=24
Please fix.
Yep, sorry about that, hit the wrong button. I just deleted it because there was no way I could restore it.
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 05:51 PM
Yep, sorry about that, hit the wrong button. I just deleted it because there was no way I was going to restore it.Would have taken all of five seconds.
Would have taken all of five seconds.
Only if I'd had access to the edit history, which I don't. But this is a waste of time anyway. I deleted my post before that one, so you get the last word.
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 05:54 PM
People complain about spam on their own site - I don't remember anyone else starting a thread to complain about spam on this site. Maybe I've forgotten about a few, but it certainly isn't a frequent occurrence.Not surprising, they're usually always ignored. I haven't noticed site feedback being all that welcome here to start with.
--------------- Added 1354301740 at 1354301740 ---------------
Only if I'd had access to the edit history, which I don't. But this is a waste of time anyway. I deleted my post before that one, so you get the last word.Yes, feedback from the customers is always a waste of time.
Yes, feedback from the customers is always a waste of time.
No, it's the arguing that's a waste of time. It's my fault, as I mentioned before (perhaps in the deleted post) I have no authority of this matter so there wasn't much point in my addressing it in the first place.
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 06:01 PM
First you accuse me of having self-serving motives here, which clearly and demonstrably, there aren't any. Then you essentially called me a liar, but you were mistaken, admitted it and apologized. Then, you accidentally edited one of my posts when you were trying to quote it (a easy fix, all that was needed was for you to remove your response and fix the quote tags.)
The entire time you were being dismissive, and not at all helpful. That's the root of the problem.
--------------- Added 1354302102 at 1354302102 ---------------
No, it's the arguing that's a waste of time. It's my fault, as I mentioned before (perhaps in the deleted post) I have no authority of this matter so there wasn't much point in my addressing it in the first place.Then why not try being helpful instead of dismissive, and leave it at that?
--------------- Added 1354302360 at 1354302360 ---------------
Yes, I notice this lately and have been reporting each post but I will just stop. I'm sure the staff will figure it out. :)^^^ He's not annoyed though anymore, just resigned. The cure.
First you accuse me of having self-serving motives here, which clearly and demonstrably, there aren't any.
I didn't accuse you, I asked.
Then you essentially called me a liar, but you were mistaken, admitted it and apologized. Then, you accidentally edited one of my posts when you were trying to quote it (a easy fix, all that was needed was for you to remove your response and fix the quote tags.)
I'm pretty sure I deleted parts of your response or else I would have done that. It was an honest mistake so I don't see how it's relevant to this discussion. I can always restore my post if you'd like to retype your response.
The entire time you were being dismissive, and not at all helpful. That's the root of the problem.
I told you that the people who handle these things are aware of the issues. I guess it's "dismissive" if they don't immediately implement whatever you suggest? In any case, I have my own opinion and I disagree that spam here is a problem.
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 06:12 PM
I didn't accuse you, I asked.In a accusatory, dismissive fashion. Ascribing motives that didn't and don't exist.I'm pretty sure I deleted parts of your response or else I would have done that.You didn't, but that's perfectly okay like it is.I told you that the people who handle these things are aware of the issues. I guess it's "dismissive" if they don't immediately implement whatever you suggest?Once again, accusatory tone, dismissive and ascribing a motive that doesn't exist. In any case, I have my own opinion and I disagree that spam here is a problem.That's not what matters though, it's the customer's perception. And clearly, reading the thread, it's not just me who is annoyed with the spam.
--------------- Added 1354302795 at 1354302795 ---------------
ETA: You've gone off the point and started attacking me - that doesn't help make you point.Nonsense, I have merely been stating the facts of what's happened here. There's no attack. I've been quite respectful and polite.
If anyone's been attacked, it's me.
Nonsense, I have merely been stating the facts of what's happened here. There's no attack.
If anyone's been attacked, it's me.
OK, I apologize if you feel you've been attacked. It really was just curiosity.
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 06:19 PM
OK, I apologize if you feel you've been attacked. It really was just curiosity.I have been respectful and polite kh... I like you and all the staff here. I didn't mean to seem disrespectful or unpleasant. I never gave you hell - I gave you the truth and you thought it was hell! :)
But I get the impression, however inaccurate it may be, that clearly you underestimate the annoyance of the spam problem here, and value your own time more than mine and that of the membership. It just seems there's a attitude here to be dismissive of complaints and suggestions about the site. That's my perception, but many others share it.
BirdOPrey5
11-30-2012, 07:16 PM
Max-when your site starts getting the traffic vBulletin.org does you will likely find you have changed your goal of stopping 100% of spam as it is unachievable.
Your site can only have a 100% success rate because relatively few people target it.
What works for you is good for you but it is not the end all answer to stop all spam.
You can't stop human spammers without stopping legitimate human traffic.
Max Taxable
11-30-2012, 07:24 PM
Max-when your site starts getting the traffic vBulletin.org does you will likely find you have changed your goal of stopping 100% of spam as it is unachievable.
Your site can only have a 100% success rate because relatively few people target it.
What works for you is good for you but it is not the end all answer to stop all spam.
You can't stop human spammers without stopping legitimate human traffic.Goals don't change because they are difficult or impossible. If that were true, we would have never made the moon landings. On the contrary, the bar should actually be raised due to difficulty, not lowered.
I get targeted daily, like most everyone else. 100s of attempts a day. There's NEW boards out there, NO posts yet, getting spammed. Happens all the time.What works for you is good for you but it is not the end all answer to stop all spam.I agree and never made any such assertion. Or even thought it, or even suggested it.
I try to help others and don't mind admitting I'm not all that good at it. But I try.
Paul M
11-30-2012, 11:25 PM
It stops them completely and redirects them off the site, and places the IP used in MU. I'm down to catching only 20 or so a day now with it.
No, it does not stop them completely, stop making wild claims.
You just contradict yourself.
If you're "down to 20" then they havent stopped. :rolleyes:
As to the rest, you have no idea what we do or do not do about spammers here, and to be blunt, its none of your business, all you need to know is they get deleted, and we try other options as required.
Since this thread is 75% arguments, closed.
vBulletin® v3.8.12 by vBS, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.