Photo gallery for 3.6?

[Jenkins]

I just upgraded to 3.6 I've never had a photo gallery in any of my previous versions, but I would like to add one now. Is there a good one that works with 3.6?

[twitch]

photopost works and there is also photopost vbgallery that has a beta available for 3.6. Go to photopost.com

[Code Monkey]

Photopost is over priced. Try Photoplog lite available here for free and if that suits your needs you will be happy. And the upgrade to pro isn't a blow to the wallet like photopost.

[Brandon Sheley]

i strongly recommend photoplog
I love it, and all the sites I've installed it on,, "lite and pro" love it equally as well :)

[twitch]

photoplog looks like a wise choice. I never knew about it :)

[ztempuser]

search around for a gallery port how to on these forums for this http://gallery.menalto.com/

its a very good port highly recomended

[SaN-DeeP]

photopost is a very good solution for a photogallery

[Ranger187]

search around for a gallery port how to on these forums for this http://gallery.menalto.com/

its a very good port highly recomended

Agreed. I have about 18,000 images in mine.

[Quarterbore]

I use Photopost and it is robust but it is not an easy system to work with... there are times I wish I had a simpler software tool but it is paid for and it serves my site well so take it for what it is worth...

Complicated and expensive, but very robust and can handle a WHOLE lot of cats, subcats, etc...

[Ranger187]

Gallery handles them just as well if not better. Before I fully implemented it, I did a mass import of over 45,000 images and had it thumbnail on the fly. Flawless once I turned the PHP timeout to a very very long number. ;)

For free, it's great. For support, you are better off shooting yourself. The few issues I had with Gallery I ended up resolving myself by recoding some of the modules. Paying members get horrid support as well. But like I said, for a free product don't expect support.

I tried Photopost and it ran less efficiently on my Dual Xeon system.