Is the SmoothBlue skin available?

[Shaliza]

I've searched the forums already, but didn't find anything about it. Can it be downloaded or is it a custom job?

[Hellcat]

AFAIK it's custom and exclusive.
To be used at vb.org only....

[Shaliza]

That explains it. Thanks!

And good job with the email hack!

[Hellcat]

Thanx :)

[Shelley_c]

The style and graphics are really simple designs (nice granted) but all the same simple and easily designed. I wouldn't condone copying the style but you could actually construct/design the style to make it your own and somewhat unique.

However, The logo on the otherhand is probably the most complex area of the whole style and the way I see it obviously needs to be designed but also sliced and rollover effects to be implemented. I guess what I'm saying is if vb.org didn't object to a simliar design being constructed I could possibly design it with it being sliced and rollover effects implemented and then add to to the graphic area.

That said, I would find it hard for them to agree (not that I would blame them) thus I wouldn't copy and post such a design unless they stated otherwise.

[Bubble #5]

I guess what I'm saying is if vb.org didn't object to a simliar design being constructed I could possibly design it with it being sliced and rollover effects implemented and then add to to the graphic area.

I don't understand what the big deal would be... as mentioned previously this style is basically generic with nothing really ground shaking in its design. Why wouldn't they want to help others and share it? :tired:

[Shelley_c]

I don't understand what the big deal would be... as mentioned previously this style is basically generic with nothing really ground shaking in its design. Why wouldn't they want to help others and share it? :tired:

I did basically say that. Or atleast, I'm sure I did. The logo is the most complex graphic that makes this style (which I also said). I would assume the author would like to keep this unique to this site. I may be wrong, probably not.

Granted, the style isn't "ground shaking" in it's design, But it comes together nicely and the logo (imo) sets it off and brings it to another level.

[Bubble #5]

I did basically say that. Or atleast, I'm sure I did.
Yes, we were agreeing with you ;)

Granted, the style isn't "ground shaking" in it's design
We did basically say that. Or atleast, we're sure we did :bunny:

[Shelley_c]

I'm sure we did. I think we did. I'm unsure now, did we? :knockedout:

[Zachery]

Even if the colors are nothing special, the graphics are. :) and the graphics are owned by vBulletin.org now.

[Shelley_c]

Even if the colors are nothing special, the graphics are. :) and the graphics are owned by vBulletin.org now.

There are still default images present in this style. Dunno If anyone mentioned it before. but wouldn't it be nice to create custom ones (if vb.org own the style and graphics) and replace the default images?

[Zachery]

Besides the editor what other things are still stock?

[Shelley_c]

Besides the editor what other things are still stock?

post_old.gif possibly post_new.gif

1. whos_online.gif
2. stats.gif
3. birthday.gif
4. calendar.gif
5. report.gif

[Zachery]

Thats hardly a large smaple of the images.

[Shelley_c]

Thats hardly a large smaple of the images.

That's a matter of opinion, I guess. To me custom means custom. I'm simply pointing out that there's images on this style which are still default.