Supported releases or not?

[NxTek]

Is there any way to enforce whether or not hacks are actually supported when they say they are? I see "Supported" checked on a lot of the hacks, but in most cases, support is no where to be found when there's an issue.

[eXtremeTim]

Is there any way to enforce whether or not hacks are actually supported when they say they are? I see "Supported" checked on a lot of the hacks, but in most cases, support is no where to be found when there's an issue.

Im sorry but you cant expect us to be around at all times. We have lives things happen were often pretty busy. We do what we can when we can. Its also harder to keep track of stuff on vb.org when you have many hacks released. There just so much to read half the time

P.S. I hear this alot with my hacks now if people would acctualy read my hack released they would know the best way to get support from me on my hacks.

Im not trying to be ignorant im just pretty worked up right now. So sorry if I come across as ignorant.

[Jenta]

Probably 90% of support questions are not a problem with the hack. It's someone the did not install/use it correctly. I have only seen a couple of bugs with all the hacks I have ever installed.
Read all the documentation carefully. Do what it says and use it as intended and you will rarely...if ever need support.

[yessir]

Im not trying to be ignorant im just pretty worked up right now. So sorry if I come across as ignorant.
Not ignorant at all IMO.

Some people need to RTFM. Being a n00b doesn't mean that it's ok to bypass the instructions, or reading completely.

I do not like that some hacks are released and become abandonware. I learned quickly that the best hacks come from the people who support their work. Unless I see active support, I'm not installing it.